Cass v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 552 · 1993
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Herron v. Shalala (1994), Diaz v. Chater (1995)
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Ehrhart v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Meredith v. Bowen · Anderson v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he hypothetical question posed by the ALJ to the VE must fully set forth the claimant's impairments to the extent that they are supported by the medical evidence in the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Shalala · Diaz v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.