Hateley v. Securities & Exchange Commission’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 653 · 1993
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. (1996), Securities & Exchange Commission v. Platforms Wireless International Corp. (2010)
23 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78Y (§ 25 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Kaiser Cement Corp. v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. · Hollinger · Leppo v. United States · Hollinger v. Titan Capital Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a fine levied against the petitioners as punishment for their conduct” but rather”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“either unwarranted in law or without justification in fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“acted collectively in violating the association's rules and because of the close relationship among the three of them”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.