Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 F.3d 816

Docket Nos. 93-6856, 93-6867.

Ali McDade Ali Jones

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Rabah Muhammad ALI, a/k/a Robert Lee Thacker, Petitioner-v.Martin J. MCDADE, Respondent-
  • Rabah Muhammad ALI, Petitioner-v.Peggie JONES; M.J. McDade

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided: October 29, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-10-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brown-Brunson v. Hunter

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-10-29

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.

Rabah Muhammad Ali, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C. in No. 93-6856 and E.D.N.C. in No. 6867.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Rabah Muhammad Ali appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition (No. 93-6856) and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint (No. 93-6867).* Our review of the records, the district courts' opinions, and the magistrate judge's report discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, with regards to No. 93-6856, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. McDade, No. CA-93-98-2 (M.D.N.C. July 28, 1993). In No. 93-6867, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ali v. Jones, No. CA-93-421-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART

¶2

*We consolidated these cases on appeal.

/8/f3d/816 · .json · Public domain