Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 F.3d 818

Docket No. 93-6818.

Johnson v. Heineman

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 27, 1993. Decided: October 28, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-10-28

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Whisenant v. Yuam · Green v. Langford McI-W

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-10-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Raymond Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Johnson v. Heineman, No. CA-93-155 (E.D.N.C. May 27, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)

/8/f3d/818 · .json · Public domain