Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 F.3d 821

Docket No. 93-6567.

United States v. Cheatham

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 27, 1993. Decided: October 26, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-10-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States of America v. Clary

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-10-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Rudolph Owen Cheatham, Appellant Pro Se.

Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Rudolph Owen Cheatham appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cheatham, Nos. CR-91-12-5; CA-93-202-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/8/f3d/821 · .json · Public domain