Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 88 · 1993
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 66 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 755 So. 2d 226 - Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. (2000), 201 Ill. 2d 324 - Robidoux v. Oliphant (2002)
47 federal appellate · 66 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Griggs-Ryan v. Smith · United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An issue is 'genuine' for purposes of summary judgment if 'the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party,' and a 'material fact' is one which 'might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here an expert presents `nothing but conclusionsno facts, no hint of an inferential process, no discussion of hypotheses considered and rejected', such testimony will be insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.