Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 F.R.D. 368

Baldwin v. Newhall

U.S. District Court

Decided October 19, 1948

U.S. District Court · decided 1948-10-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1950

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1948-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WATSON, District Judge.

¶1Hearing was duly held on motion 'by plaintiff for an order requiring defendant to produce certain reports or memoranda and answer thereto.

¶2At said hearing testimony was taken, and, after consideration, it appearing that the defendant did not and does not have possession, custody, or control of the reports and memoranda in question, plaintiff’s motion to produce should be dismissed.

¶3It is the opinion of this Court that the information requested by the plaintiff in his motion may be secured by other means at his disposal under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

¶4Plaintiff’s motion to produce is dismissed.

/8/frd/368 · .json · Public domain