Miller v. Hano’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1971
1 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77O (§ 15 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77V (§ 22 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp. · Schillner v. H. Vaughan Clarke & Co. · Blank v. Bitker · Howard v. United States ex rel. Alexander · 27 F. Supp. 239 - F. & M. SKIRT CO. v. A. Wimpfheimer & Bro.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * every person who controls through stock ownership or otherwise any person liable under section 12 (Section 77 l ) is also made liable `jointly and severally with and to the same extent as such controlled person.' The convenience of establishing such joint and several liability in a single suit is obvious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whittaker v. Wall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.