8 Haw. App. 330 - State v. Hirano’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1 · Gibson v. United States · Jones v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the assistance of counsel for the accused's defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mundon“constitutional rights to self-representation and representation by counsel are viewed as mutually exclusive”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mundon“does not have a constitutional right to choreograph special appearances by counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mundon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.