Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 HAWAPP 58 - Hammon v. Monsef

Hammon v. Monsef’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ritter v. Smith · 4 Haw. App. 286 - Hayashi v. Hayashi · Myers v. Myers · 7 Haw. App. 11 - Woodworth v. Woodworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “something more than a 'mere' change in the law is necessary to provide the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief.” We further agree with the view that “[t]he broad power granted by clause (6) is not for the purpose of relieving a party from free, calculated, and deliberate choices [she] has made. A party remains under a duty to take legal steps to protect [her] own interests. In particular, it ordinarily is not permissible to use this motion to remedy a failure to take an appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.