People v. Self’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1975
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Breithaupt v. Abram · 116 Ill. App. 2d 332 - People v. Williams · 128 Ill. App. 2d 338 - Weaver v. Lovell · 7 Ill. App. 3d 617 - People v. Todd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(b) Upon the trial of any action or proceeding arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person while driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person’s blood at the time of the act alleged as shown by a chemical analysis of his breath, blood, urine, saliva or other bodily substance is admissible, and the result of any such analysis shall give rise to the following presumptions: 1. If there was 0.05 percent or less by weight of alcohol in the person’s blood, it shall be presumed that such person was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 2. If there was in excess of 0.05 percent but less than 0.15 percent of weight of alcohol in the person’s blood, such fact shall not give rise to any presumption that the person was or was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor, but such fact may be considered with other competent evidence in determining whether such person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor; 3. If there was 0.15 percent or more by weight of alcohol in the person’s blood, it shall be presumed that such person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 4. The foregoing provisions of this paragraph (b) ■ shall not be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing upon the question whether or not defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.