People v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · 26 Ill. 2d 557 - The PEOPLE v. Woods · 108 Ill. App. 2d 172 - People v. Smith · 31 Ill. 2d 415 - The PEOPLE v. Brown · 115 Ill. App. 2d 318 - People v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was not advised that he could have stopped the questioning at any time. Such warning, however, is not essential.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Colon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.