Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ill. App. 3d 91 - Schultz v. Marcin

8 Ill. App. 3d 91 - Schultz v. Marcin’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 132 Ill. App. 2d 532 - Havlik v. Marcin · People ex rel. Mayes v. Wanek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any 5 legal voters of any *** precinct in which an election has been held as provided for in this Act, may within 10 days after the canvass of the returns of such election *** contest the validity of such election by filing a verified petition in the Cir-cult Court *** setting forth the grounds for the contest.” (Emphasis added.) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 43, par. 182.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.