Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 INDAPP 43 - Keesling v. Doyle

Keesling v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2019

15 state decisions

601893190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heap v. Parrish · McCullough v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Public records are notice to the world, and it is not necessary to prove that a man has examined a record in order to bind him with notice of its contents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.