Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 I. & N. Dec. 646

R

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1960

Board of Immigration Appeals · decided 1960-07-01

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on United States Johnson v. Shaughnessy · United States of America, Ex Rel. Margarita Julia Leon v. John L. Murff, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization

Decided 1960-07-01

                             MATTER OF R—

                   In DEPORTATION Proceedings
                                 A-7488062
                       Decided by Board May 20, 1960

Mental defect—Temporary illness due to wartime experiences.
Service has not sustained burden of proving that alien was afflicted with mental defect (schizophrenia) at time of entry when evidence reasonably supports conclusion that he suffered from temporary illness akin to neurosis
 brought on by wartime experiences.

CHARGE'

  Order : Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (1) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (1)]—Excludahle
           at entry—Mental defective (section 3, Act of February 5, 1917).

                           BEFORE THE BOARD

   Discussion: This case is before us on appeal from the decision
of the special inquiry officer finding respondent deportable on the
charge stated in the order to show cause. The special inquiry officer
granted respondent voluntary departure with an automatic order of
deportation in the event he fails to depart. Respondent is 29 years
old, a native and formerly a citizen of Poland. His only entry into
the United States was at Boston, Massachusetts, on May 26, 1950,
when he was admitted as an immigrant. The special inquiry officer
states that the sole issue as to deportability is whether respondent
was suffering from a mental defect within the meaning of section 3
of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917, as amended, at the
time of his entry.
  Respondent was born in Poland in 1931 but attended school only
2 years. Following the invasion of Poland by the German Nazis,
his father was killed. According to his testimony, respondent and
his mother hid in the forest, perhaps for 2 years. They were
eventually apprehended, and respondent's mother was sent to Auschwitz concentration camp. Respondent denied that he was Jewish
and was placed in a labor camp by the Nazis. He states that he
worked in an underground factory making airplane parts, that he
worked from early in the morning until night with pt'actically no
food and very harsh treatment. Others in the camp, discovering

                                     646
 that he was Jewish, teased him by threatening to expose him, although they never did so. After his liberation by the Allied forces
he was hospitalized for malnutrition, and eventually he was sent to
an orphanage in Italy, where he was discovered by his mother at
the end of 1947.
   In 1948 respondent complained of not feeling well and, showing
evidence of emotional distress, he was taken by his mother to the
 Clinic for Nervous and Mental Diseases at the University of Rome,
 where he was admitted on June 23, 1948. The record contains a
short psychiatric report, in Italian and English, with reference to
his hospitalization there. The only diagnosis in this record is,
"Diagnosis, on first admission, schizophrenic syndrome." Based on
information furnished by respondent's mother, the director of the
clinic states, "As Polish Jew, the patient must have been submitted
to trying times, living away from mother, hiding in forests and
then in a concentration camp  Status: Patient in bed, in bad
temper, lucid and well oriented; states that everything is exaggeration on the part of mother and not true. Occasionally shows difficulties in speech." He was given 10 electroshock treatments and
was "dismissed in improved condition" on August 19, 1918.
   The record does not show how respondent occupied himself from
the time he was discharged from the hospital in Rome until he
came to the United States in May 1950. He went to Cincinnati,
lived by himself, and was employed until September 1950. The
record shows that he consulted Dr. S B in that city in August 1950. Apparently, respondent consulted Dr. B          only once.
   Respondent went to Newark, New Jersey, to join his mother in
September 1950, entered the Newark Central High School and attended briefly. Early in 1951 respondent consulted a doctor at the
Jewish hospital who suggested that, while he did not have to go
into a hospital, by doing so he could get treatment more quickly,
get it over with, and continue his studies. He went into Brooklyn
State Hospital on March 28, 1951, had insulin therapy, and was
approved for discharge on June 19, 1951. The diagnosis at that
institution was "dementia praecox- -catatonic type." The final conference conclusions are that the patient "is now free of delusions
and hallucinations."
   The record contains two certifications from the United States
Public Health Service. The first, dated August 1, 1956, certifies
that, based on the 1-234 (Certificate as to Alien Becoming a Public
Charge), and the clinical summary from the Brooklyn State Hospital, in the opinion of two Public Health doctors the alien was
certifiable for "a Class A mental defect, schizoid personality, at the
time of entry into the United States on May 26, 1950," and, "It is
also our opinion that the alien became a. public charge as the result
                                 647
of an affliction with a Class A mental defect, dementia praecox,
catatonic type, not affirmatively shown to have arisen subsequent to
entry on the date stated." At the request of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service, the Public Health doctors reevaluated the
record, including the findings of Drs. B and R the report
from the University of Rome, and the transcript of the testimony
in this case. On October 19, 1059, they altered their certification to
state that it was their opinion that respondent was "certifiable for a
Class A condition, mental defect, schizophrenia, at the time of entry
into the United States on May 26, 1950." There is no "became a
public charge" ground in this case. At no time did the United_
States Public Health Service doctors examine or interview respondent personally.
   Since respondent was discharged from the hospital in June 1951,
he has been almost continuously employed at $40 to $65 a week,
primarily doing office work, and, in addition, has been almost continuously going to school. He graduated from high school in 1955
and received a B. A. degree from the Yeshiva University of Brooklyn in 1951. He has also been granted a degree of Bachelor of
Religious Education and a teacher's certificate. He is now teaching
at the Yeshiva University, in addition to continuing his graduate
studies. He has received scholarships from Jewish organizations,
but otherwise has been self-supporting. The record contains letters
and reports from several of respondent's professors, one of whom
teaches psychology at Columbia, as well as at Yeshiva University.
Thoy testify to respondent's excellence as a student, his maturity,
popularity with his classmates, acquired competence in the English
language, his stability and high standards of ethics. The record
also contains recommendations from former employers regarding
his integrity, honesty, ability, and popularity.
   The record contains two communications from Dr. B—, exhibits
5 and 14, stating that, on the basis of his interview with respondent
and on the basis of follow-up material supplied since that time, it
is the opinion of Dr. B— that in 1950 respondent was suffering
from anxiety hysteria, resulting from excessive psychological stress
arising from the external environment with which respondent was
attempting to cope. He likened the situation to "combat fatigue"
in war time, stating that "normal healthy men when exposed to
persistent stress of war for prolonged periods" will begin to show
so-called "neurotic" symptoms of behavior. However, as respondent
became more adjusted, familiar with the new language and culture
he demonstrated ability to function well in his social, academic, anC
marital life and is currently performing in college and otherwisf
with the "highest minority of normally functioning people."
   Dr. H       R     , whose qualifications as a psychiatrist are con
                                 648
 ceded by the special inquiry officer, and who has testified previously
 in immigration matters, discussed the nature and treatment of
 schizophrenia. The special inquiry officer's decision deals with Dr.
 R 's testimony at some length. Dr. R—, in a 7-page singlespaced statement accompanying this appeal, indicates that he feels
 strongly that the opinion of the special inquiry officer does not
 accurately reflect the substance of his testimony, nor his reasons for
 disagreeing with the diagnosis of the Brooklyn State Hospital and
 the certifications of the Public Health Service. He declares that
 schizophrenia is a basic personality condition which takes long and
 intensive treatment, that a small number of electroshocks and a
 short period of treatment will never result in improvement in a
 case of true schizophrenia. Respondent had less than one month
 of hospitalization in Rome, and two and a half months in Brooklyn.
 Dr. R— testified that the same is true of insulin treatment, that
 discharge after less than 3 months of insulin treatment and hospitalization would not have been sufficient for improvement and
 discharge if respondent truly had dementia praecox, schizophrenia
 or schizoid personality, all of which mean the same thing. He
 states that the Italian dagnosis of "Schizophrenic syndrome" does
 not mean the same as schizophrenia, that "syndrome" means "symptoms." He testified that shock treatments, plus psychoanalysis, plus
 long hospitalization, plus a protected environment following discharge are all essential to remission of true schizophrenia. Respondent has had none of these prerequisites to cure, It is his
 opinion that both in Rome and in Brooklyn respondent was hospitalized because of the economic condition of the family, the fact
that there was no family circle, no warm and comfortable home to
care for respondent while he was being given out-patient treatment.
To bath Dr. B and Dr. P. the most important evidence
which negatives schizophrenia is that, since his discharge from
Brooklyn State Hospital in 1951, respondent has successfully pursued a most strenuous life, attending school, working, teaching, and
is now married.
   The text material available to us substantiates the testimony of
Dr. R and the depositions of that witness and Dr. B— regarding the nature and treatment of schizophrenia generally. Encyclopedia Britannica, 1955 Edition, Vol. 20, under the heading
"Schizophrenia," described the four major types and states that
among ether treatments are the insulin and electroshock treatments
and, further, "In many cases, what seems most important is to
provide the patient with an environment in which he is protected
and in which he can work through his periods of confusion and
away from the disturbing influences of his ordinary environment."
Volume 18, the same reference work, under "Psychiatry" devotes
                                 649
considerable discussion to "War Neuroses," describing the - manifestations, causes and treatments presently available and, 'important to
us, states, "A few latently psychotic soldiers develop a full-blown
malignant psychosis such as schizophrenia. Others become tempo -.
rarily psychotic,. with pathological suspiciousness or loss of comprehension of present reality; recovery is rapid on removal to safety.
Very few malignant and permanent psychoses develop.  Among
the important causative factors for these neurotic reactions are
physical and emotional depletion and fatigue."        (Emphasis supplied.)
 • Legal Medicine, edited by R. B. II. Gradwohl (Mosby Co., 1051),
is not describing respondent when it states (p. 898), The latent
schizophrenic is an individual in a recession or a prolonged arrested
phase. The latent schizophrenic has a bizarre, unsatisfied, isolated
adjustment to life and may be inadequate to maintain his economic
independence unless his position in life has 'unusual protective features. Schizophrenics suffer from eccentricities, from inability to
understand the people about them, and from queer notions about
the significance of social values and customs. As they feel isolated,
they are hostile, suspicious, and insecure, finding their way into
weak passivity or dangerous aggressiveness and poorly controlled
hates."
    .Fundamental Psychiatry, Cavanagh and McGolderick (Bruce,
 1954) .(p. 328), declares that certain prognosis for the schizoPhrenias is impossible. Discussing the matter of treatment of
 patients who have suffered schizophrenic episodes, this work stresses
 that the schizophrenic will remain in his world of images and complexes so long as he finds them more pleasant than he does the
 world of reality, and that it must be realized that the process of
 recovery will be slow, and that psychotherapy is absolutely essential.
     Psychiatry and Law, Guttmacher and WeihOfen (Norton and Co.,
 1952) (pp. 72-80), stresses the "malignancy and chronicity" of this
 psychosis and states, "There is probably no .problem in modern
 pathology, except that of cancer, on which there has been so much
 work with so little in the way of concrete results." Following a
 discussion of the symptoms, treatments, and theory, this work also
 mentions the war neuroses (p. 78) : "A very interesting group of
 psychoses occurred during the war, most of them in combat soldiers.
 These were short-lived psychotic illnesses which cleared up abruptly
 after two or three weeks' hospitalization. Most of the symptoms
 were typical of schizophrenia." These authorities and others persuade us that respondent, who has sought, and been successful in
 a most strenuous and outgoing life, could not have suffered fron
  true schizophrenia.
     The legislative history of the 1952 act does not, in our opinion
                                  650
 indicate a Congressional intention to exclude such a person as respondent, or congressional understanding that a person such as he
 would have been excluded in the past. The Public Health Service
 report on the medical aspects of H.R. 2379, House Report No. 1365,
 82d Gong., 2d Sess. (February 14, 1952, pp. 47 48) states:
  Mental defect.—The utilization of the term "mental defect" serves a very
useful purpose and should be continued within the language of the bill. It
should be pointed out that in using this expression, "mental defect," it has or
bears no relationship to mental deficiency whiCh is related to the intellectual
status of the individual.  Such a term could also be used to cover the
more severely disabling neuroses and conduct and habit disorders of adults
and children. It can be used in classifying those persons who are likely to be
brought into repeated conflict with social customs, authority, or society in
general. 
      House Report No. 1365 also states (pp. 46-47) :
   Psychopathic personality—  The conditions classified within the group
of psychopathic personalities are, in effect, disorders of the personality. They
are characterized by developmental defects or pathological trends in the personality structure manifest by lifelong patterns of action or behavior, rather
than by mental or emotional symptoms. Individuals with such a disorder may
manifest a disturbance of intrinsic personality patterns, exaggerated personality trends, or are persons ill primarily in terms cf society and the prevailing
culture. The latter or sociopathic reactions are frequently symptomatic of a
severe underlying neurosis or psychosis and frequently include those groups of
individuals suffering from addiction or sexual deviation. 
  Senate Report No. 1515, 81st Congress, 2d Session (April 20,
1950), also indicates an intention to exclude aliens who are definitely
mentally ill. There is no discussion of the term "mental defect,"
but with reference to the exclusion of persons with "constitutional
psychopathic inferiority," this report. says (p. 343) that the exclusion of persons within the meaning of that term was "aimed at
keeping out of the country aliens with a propensity to mental
aberration, tlioSe with an inherent likelihood of becoming mental
cases, as indicated by their case history.  (p. 345) The present
clauses excluding mentally and physically defective aliens, with
three exceptions, are sufficiently broad to provide adequate protection to the population of the United States, without being unduly
harsh or restrictive."
   The Manual for Medical Examination of Aliens, United States
Public Health Service, makes it clear that a person is not to be
certified as afflicted with a "mental defect" unless he is seriously
ill or if his difficulty is only temporary. This instructive handbook provides, chapter 6, section A:
  4. Insanity.  d. Not all persons who meet the aforementioned criteria
are certifiable as insane, for section   04.7 of the regulation:5. (chapter 1) states
"that a class A certificate or class A notification of a mental defect, disease,
  1   The reference is to 42 CFR 34.7, which embodies this directive.

                                          051
or disability shall in no case be issued with respect to an alien having only
mental shortcomings due to ignorance, or suffering only from a mental condition (i) attributable to remedial physical causes or (ii) of a temporary nature, caused by a toxin, drug, or disease." This implies those acute brain
syndromes resulting from poison, systemic Infection, exhaustion, or malnutrition. It must be borne in mind that this does not conflict with the requirement that a class A certificate shall be issued for narcotic drug addiction or
for excludable mental disorders existing in the case of addiction to other drugs.

   10. Mental defect.—a. Under this term is classified any mental disease not
discussed above which when it seriously impairs the mental function of the
alien and gravely interfers with his total behavior and interpersonal relations is to be regarded as excludable. 
   b. The determination of the existence of a serious degree of mental abnormal'ty must be left to the examining physician, but several criteria are given
below as an aid to him in exercising his professional judgment: (1) whether
the mental defect is of an hereditary nature; (2) whether it would require
hospitalization; (3) whether the individual's behavior resulting from the defect is such as to be likely to bring him lute repeated conflict with social
customs, constituted authority, or the social environment.

  e. Individuals suffering from psychoneurosis are certifiable for mental defect only upon determination of a serious degree of mental illness in accordance with the criteria outlined above. J.Emphask supplied throughout.)
   In addition to the above directions, Section B of the Manual,
Types of Certificates in Various Diagnostic Categories, page 6 15,           -



lists "Transient Situational Personality Disorders, gross stress reaction," with the symbol "K," for which the directions are, "Do not
certify." It seems clear that the regulationo adequately cover the
instant case, and that they do not contemplate that a person such
as respondent should be deported on the charge laid here.
   Respondent's brief on appeal cites four cases, all unreported, in
each of which the Board found that the Immigration Service had
not met the burden of establishing that the mental illness existed at
time of entry. In a number of cases, unreported, the Board has
invoked 42 CFR 31.7 and found that temporary conditions (e.g.,
injuries, post-partem psychoses, illnesses due to surgery and glandular conditions, etc.) do not constitute insanity or mental defects for
immigration purposes. The only reported Board decisions on this
subject are Matter of W , 
2 I. & N. Dec. 68
; Matter of S—,
5 I. & N. Dec. 682
, similar to the instant proceeding; and Matter of
 V , 2 1. & N. Dec. 127, where the order of exclusion was affirmed.
   In the instant case, we have conflicting evidence and medical
 diagnoses as to whether respondent' was ail icted with a mental defect at the time of his last entry. Since the question arises in
 deportation, as distinguished from exclusion proceedings, the Board
 is required to evaluate all the evidence of record, including the
 certificates of the United States Public Health Serivce and the

                                       652
evidence submitted by respondent, in order to determine whether the
charge is sustained. United States ex rel. Johnson v. Shaughnessy,
336 U.S. 806
 (1949) ; United States ex rel. Leon v. Murff, 
250 F.2d 436
 (C.A. 2, 1957).
  Although there is nothing in the record one way or the other, we
must assume that respondent was thoroughly examined in Italy,
both mentally and physically, before he was issued an immigration
visa for entry into the United States for permanent residence. The
only evidence of mental illness prior to respondent's entry into the
United States is the less than 2 months in the hospital in Rome,
where his diagnosis on admission was "schizophrenic syndrome,"
and there was no further diagnosis at the time of dismissal. In
addition, we have the two certifications of the United States Public
Health Service, exhibits 3 and 13, based, not on personal examination of the alien, but on other documents (of record here) submitted
for their opinion, and a clinical summary and certification as to
alien's becoming a public charge from the Brooklyn State Hospital,
Brooklyn, New York, both documents created at the time of his
second illness. On the other hand, the alien has offered medical
testimony of two psychiatrists who examined him personally, one
in 1950 before the second period of illness, and the other who has
 seen him recently and over a period of the last several years. Both
 agree that he is not schizophrenic, that he did not have schizophrenia, that his illness were akin to war neurosis, brought on not
 only by his war experiences, but by his efforts to adjust while still
in his "teens," alone and unaided, to life in two foreign countries,
Italy and the United States, in rapid succession, neither of whose
languages he. knew.
   So far as this record shows, the alien has made a successful adjustment to life in the United States, having obtained two college
degrees within the past 9 years while he was learning the English
language. He is married, and has been and is self-supporting. A
large body of psychiatric writing indicates that if respondent had
been suffering from schizophrenia he could not, following brief
periods of hospitalization and treatment, have again emerged into
a. new and highly competitive society and fended for himself under
the most strenuous conditions.
   It seems reasonable enough from the medical testimony offered by
respondent, and confirmed by other authorities available to us, and
even more so by respondent's performance during the past 9 years,
that his was a temporary disability due to exhaustion and malnutrition, and was a transient stress reaction to the difficult circumstances
of the previous 10 years and the immediate situation in which he
found himself at the time. His illness was not a mental defect of
an hereditary nature ; it has not brought him into "repeated conflict
                                 653
with social customs, constituted authority, or the social environment;
and there is even some question that he could be said to have "required hospitalization." Diagnosis as to the course of respondent's
illness would have been difficult in 1951, as paragraph 4e of the
Manual for Medical Examination of Aliens (Chapter 6, Section 4,
p. 6 4) points out, but it is easy enough now to say that it was due
to remediable physical causes, and this is our conclusion.
   The Immigration Service has not sustained the burden of proving
that respondent was excludable at the time of his entry as a person
a L ed with a mental defect, to wit ; schizophrenia. The proceedings will be terminated.
   Order : It is ordered that the proceedings be and are hereby
terminated.




                                  654

/8/indec/646 · .json · Public domain