Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Kan. App. 2d 237 - State v. Walters

8 Kan. App. 2d 237 - State v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Draper v. United States · Dunn v. United States · M. Morrin & Son Co. v. Burgess Construction Co. · White v. Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There are no Kansas cases directly in point. We do note Kansas ‘borrowed’ K.S.A. 21-3205 [the aiding and abetting statute] from Minnesota. Kansas did not adopt subdivision 3 of Minn. Stat. Ann. § 609.05 (West 1964), which provides a defense if the defendant abandons his purpose and makes a reasonable effort to prevent the commission of the crime prior to its commission.” 8 Kan. App. 2d at 241 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.