Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Kan. App. 2d 667 - State v. Heiskell

8 Kan. App. 2d 667 - State v. Heiskell’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Hunter (1987), State v. Jordan (1992)

6 district · 23 state decisions

1101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Gooding v. Wilson · Lewis v. City of New Orleans · In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · Equity Investors, Inc. v. Academy Insurance Group, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the function of the appellate court to determine whether the record discloses any evidence which, considered in the light most favorable to defendant, would have justified giving the requested instruction. State v. Hargis, 5 Kan. App. 2d at 609 . See also State v. Kleber, 2 Kan. App. 2d 115, 116-17 , 575 P.2d 900 , rev. denied 225 Kan. 846 (1978).” 8 Kan. App. 2d at 673 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Disorderly conduct is, with knowledge or probable cause to believe that such acts will alarm, anger or disturb others or provoke an assault or other breach of the peace: (a) Engaging in brawling or fighting; or (c) Using offensive, obscene, or abusive language or engaging in noisy conduct tending reasonably to arouse alarm, anger or resentment in others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.