Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Kan. App. 2d 726 - Sharma v. Sharma

8 Kan. App. 2d 726 - Sharma v. Sharma’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wisconsin v. Yoder · Sherbert v. Verner · Everson v. Board of Education · Reynolds v. States · Ringgold v. Borough of Collingswood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition, the husband apparently does not share his wife’s religious beliefs about divorce, since he sought the decree. Under these circumstances, to compel him to remain married because of the wife’s religious beliefs would be to prefer her beliefs over his. Any such preference is prohibited by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The government may not “aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another.” Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15 , 67 S.Ct. 504, 511 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.