Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 LA 26 - Keene v. Lizardi

Keene v. Lizardi’s Empirical Analysis

1835

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1994

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3018351840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true, juries sometimes very properly give what is called ‘smart money.’' They are often warranted in giving vindictive damages as a punishment inflicted for outrageous conduct. But this is only justifiable in an action against the wrongdoer, and not against persons who, on account of their relation to-the offender, are only consequentially liable for his acts, as the principal is-responsible for the acts of his factor or agent”—”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.