¶1said that the true measure of the plaintiff’s damages in this action was the value of the goods replevied, with the damages and costs recovered in the action of replevin, and interest on the two last articles from the date of the judgment in replevin to the present time.
8 Mass. 145
Arnold v. Bailey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 15, 1811
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1811-10-15
<p>Debt on a bond conditioned to prosecute a suit in replevin.</p> <p>The defendants, being defaulted, prayed to be heard in equity. Upon the hearing it appeared that the plaintiff, a deputy sheriff, had attached the goods on mesne process, on which final judgment, had been rendered.</p>
Decided 1811-10-15