Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1995
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 7 Smith & H. 57 - Fidelity Trust Co. v. Service Laundry Co. · In Re the Accounting of Tracy · Davis v. Price · 28 Tenn. App. 282 - Podesta v. Podesta · Williams v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * the will in this case was drawn by an attorney and the distinction between State Inheritance taxes and Federal Estate taxes is so widely known that in our opinion the express mention of Inheritance taxes indicates an intention not to include Federal Estate taxes.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.