Cross v. People’s Empirical Analysis
1860
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1921
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holbrook v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““amounts to a prohibition of exceptions, and of the writ of error, and clearly shows that the proceeding was regarded as extraordinary and anomalous, and that jurisdiction was limited to the circuit court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Swanson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.