Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Misc. 690

Behr v. Menendez

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1894

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1894-04-15

<p>Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate and set aside a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs.</p>

Decided 1894-04-15

McCarthy, J.

¶1This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate and set aside a judgment entered herein in favor of plaintiffs, on the ground that the same is irregular in that the issues arising on an alleged counterclaim were not tried or disposed of according to law.

¶2*691The judgment was entered on a verdict directed by the court.

¶3We have passed on this question in our opinion (at this General Term) on the appeal from the judgment.

¶4At most, the contention set up by the defendant could have gone only to a reduction of plaintiffs’ claim as conceded by the defendant’s answer.

¶5■ The trial justice, having ruled out the evidence offered to prove defendant’s counterclaim, passed on the issues presented, and thus there was no offset or deduction to be made and the plaintiffs became entitled to a verdict for the full amount.

¶6The proper course left, then, for defendant was by appeal from the judgment, and not by the method here adopted.

¶7The order should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

¶8Conlan, J., concurs.

¶9Order affirmed, with costs.

/8/misc/690 · .json · Public domain