State v. Taylor.

Decided June 5, 1821

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1821-06-05

From Halifax. This Defendant stood charged on two indictments, which were tried in the Court below, and terminated in an acquittal of the Defendant. On the trial below, the Court refused to permit certain papers to be read as evidence on the part of the State, and the Attorney-General appealed.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1900

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“It would be to no purpose for this Court to decide whether the paper-writings offered in evidence were properly rejected by the circuit judge or not; for upon the supposition that they were not, we could not grant a new trial after the acquittal of the defendant.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. . Savery

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1821-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Tayior, Chief-Justice,

¶1 delivered the opinion of the Court:

¶2 It would be to no purpose for this Court to decide, whether the paper writings offered in evidence were properly rejected by the Circuit Judge or not; for upon the supposition that they were not, we could not grant a new trial after the acquittal of the Defendant.

¶3 *463 The act of 1815, ch. 895, gives the power of granting yew trials to the Superior Courts, only where the De-fcndant is found guilty. As, therefore, the Judge trying this cause could not have awarded a new trial, we cannot reverse his judgment for having refused it. The Verdict must consequently remain.