in this case, a judgment bad been rendered against Wood, the, Defendant, in the Court below, which, upon appeal by him, was affirmed in this Court at May Term, IS 19. The record, by some omission of the Clerk below, did not state the precise sum of the recovery and costs, so that execution could not be issued from this Court. moved now to enter it mmc pro tunc, and he had brought up the whole record.
¶2
said, that the parties were now out of Court, and it would be a dangerous practice to allow it,
*96
as a spurious record might be brought up, or the judg-mevit may have been satisfied: And the. motion was refused.
¶3
^ a subsequent day,
Gaston
renewed bis motion, having in the mean time served the appellant with notice, of it, and he not appearing to oppose it, it was all ¡wed, and the judgment for the specific sum entered
nunc pro tunc.