D.D. v. D.P.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on White v. Silbernagel · In re Adoption of T.L. and T.L. M.G. v. R.J. and E.J. · In Re The Adoption of S.W. Thomas West v. Ronnie D. Sedberry and Sondra A. Sedberry · Devlin v. Peyton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, a trial court enters findings of fact and conclusions of law, this Court first determines whether the evidence supports the findings. In re Adoption of T.L., 4 N.E.3d 658, 662 (Ind. 2014). Then, the Court determines whether the findings support the judgment. Id. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law will be set aside only if they are clearly erroneous, or, in other words, the record contains no facts or inferences to support them. Id. The trial court’s judgment is clearly erroneous when “ ‘it is unsupported by the findings of fact and the conclusions of law relying on those findings.’” Id. (quoting In re Adoption of T.W., 859 N.E.2d 1215, 1217 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.