8 Neb. Ct. App. 97 - Elstun v. Elstun’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · Weichert v. United States · Eaton v. Louisiana · State Ex Rel. Grape v. Zach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he record does not show that Mike requested that additional evidence be admitted, that additional questions be asked, or that Denise be cross-examined. The record instead shows that he was provided an ample and unfettered opportunity to present his version of the facts. There being no showing of prejudicial error, we accordingly reject this assignment of error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elstun v. Elstun
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.