Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 NH 550 - State v. Rollins

State v. Rollins’s Empirical Analysis

1837

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
16
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Katz v. Walkinshaw (1903), State v. Dubina (1972)

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions — followed in 16 states

801837184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There seems to be no reason to doubt, therefore, that the body of the English common law, and the statutes in amendment of it, so far as they are applicable to the government instituted here, and to the condition of the people, were in force here, as a part of the law of the province, except where other provision was made by express statute, or by local usage.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““All the laws which have heretofore been adopted, used and approved, in the province, colony, or state of New Hampshire, and usually practiced on in the courts of law, shall remain and be in full force until altered and repealed by the Legislature; such parts thereof only excepted as are repugnant to the rights and liberties contained in this Constitution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.