Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 N.J. Eq. 600

Baldwin v. Campfield

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1852

New Jersey Court of Chancery · decided 1852-02-15

Bill filed in March, 1847, stating, that, on the 29th of June, 1838, one Henry Speer recovered a judgment against Jeremiah Baldwin, the complainant, and one Henry Slough, in the Circuit Court of Essex, for the penal sum of f193.37, on a bond given by Slough and the complainant to the said Speer, with $29.44 costs. 'That on the 27 th of June, 1839, a fi.fa. de bonis et terris was issued thereon and levied on a certain' dwelling-house and lot of land in Canal street, Newark,…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1888

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1852-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Chancellor.

¶1There can be no doubt, that the first deed from the complainant to the defendant, and the arrangement, at the sheriff’s sale, by which the property was struck off and conveyed to the defendant and the purchase money paid by the complainant, were both made for the fraudulent purpose of putting, or attempting to put, the property beyond the reach of the creditors of the complainant. No trust can result in favor of the complainant from such a transaction.

¶2Bill dismissed.

/8/njeq/600 · .json · Public domain