Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 N.J. Super. 253

Newman v. Newman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1950-06-21

Relies on 134 N.J. Eq. 61 - Goc v. Goc · 138 N.J. Eq. 611 - Rush v. Rush

Decided 1950-06-21

Per Curiam.

¶1This is the defendant’s appeal from a judgment holding that certain cash, bank accounts and government bonds were jointly owned by plaintiff and defendant and awarding a one-half interest in such jointly-owned property to plaintiff. The case is a factual one and our examination of the record convinces us that the court below correctly found the facts and applied the applicable law as stated in Goc v. Goc, 134 N. J. Eq. 61 (E. & A. 1943) and Rush v. Rush, 138 N. J. Eq. 611 (E. & A. 1946).

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/8/njsuper/253 · .json · Public domain