Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 N.J. Super. 279 - Jacobson v. Kaminsky

8 N.J. Super. 279 - Jacobson v. Kaminsky’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1950
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a natural hesitation on the part of the appellate tribunal, confined as it is to the written word, to disturb factual conclusions of the judicial officer to whom the evidence has been orally presented,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.