8 Ohio App. 2d 166 - State v. Goodman’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2025
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 1 Ohio Misc. 81 - State v. Schultz · 125 Ohio St. 415 - Miller v. State · 120 Ohio App. 176 - State v. Latham · 112 Ohio App. 471 - State v. Gundlach · 95 Ohio App. 526 - State v. Holbrook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) As used in this section, ‘street racing’ means the operation of two or more vehicles from a point side by side at accelerating speeds in a competitive attempt to out-distance each other or the operation of one or more vehicles over a common selected course, from the same point to the same point, wherein timing is made of the participating vehicles involving competitive accelerations or speeds. “* * * The operation of two or more vehicles side by side either at speeds in excess of prima-faeie lawful speeds established by Section 333.03 or rapidly accelerating from a common starting point to a speed in excess of such primafacie lawful speeds shall be prima-facie evidence of speed racing. “(b) No person shall participate in street racing upon any public road, street or highway in this Municipality. (ORC 4511.251)” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In both cases, there is an intent on the part of one driver to out-distance another vehicle. However, in drag racing, there must be a mutual intent between the drivers of two vehicles to out-distance each other. In other words, a driver has an intent to compete or race with the driver of another specific vehicle, who has a similar intent as to the first driver. In a passing maneuver, the passing driver’s intent is an impersonal one directed at a vehicle proceeding directly in front of him, whose speed or operation at that time is such that he wishes to pass. The driver of the overtaken vehicle must give way to the right and must not increase his speed.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In our opinion it was questionable whether the state had submitted evidence to sustain a conviction of drag racing, at the conclusion of its case. The alleged drag racing took place on the straightaway. According to the police officer’s testimony, two vehicles were operating side by side at speeds in excess of the speed limit. These facts standing alone would * * * establish a prima facie case against plaintiff.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Volk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.