8 Ohio App. 2d 277 - State v. Call’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2008
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States against unreasonable searches and seizures is applicable to searches of motor vehicles. "2. Where an exemption from the requirement of a search warrant is claimed, the burden is on those seeking such exemption to show the need therefor. "3. A police officer may not search, or seize articles found in, a motor vehicle following an arrest for `speeding,' where the circumstances are such that there is no reasonable basis for believing that a search for weapons is necessary for such officer's protection or to prevent an escape, and such officer has no probable cause to believe that a crime had been or is being committed. "* * * "5. Cause to believe, not supported by facts which constitute a basis for a reasonable cause for belief, is not sufficient to constitute reasonable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“3. A police officer may not search, or seize articles found in, a motor vehicle following an arrest for `speeding,' where the circumstances are such that there is no reasonable basis for believing that a search for weapons is necessary for such officer's protection or to prevent an escape, and such officer has no probable cause to believe that a crime had been or is being committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“1. The protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States against unreasonable searches and seizures is applicable to searches of motor vehicles.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.