Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ohio App. 3d 119 - State v. Haynes

8 Ohio App. 3d 119 - State v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2023

13 state decisions

4019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Bauer · State v. Mick · State v. Clayton Brooks Hale · Cates v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “enable the arrest of the accused to be made under a warrant of the governor on a requisition of the executive authority of the state having jurisdiction of the offense, unless the accused furnishes bail or until he is legally discharged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “bail for his appearance and surrender . . . within a period not to exceed sixty days after the date of such new bond.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.