Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Mathews

8 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson (1994), 154 Ohio App. 3d 250 - State v. Buchanan (2003)

1 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

43019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not contemplate that punishment will be a subject of plea bargaining, this being a matter either determined expressly by statute or lying with the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`* * * Crim. R. 11(F) does not provide for negotiation with respect to the punishment to be imposed but, instead, refers only to negotiated pleas `of guilty or no contest to one or more offenses charged or to one or more other or lesser offenses.' In other words, [Crim. R. 11(F)] does not contemplate that punishment will be a subject of plea bargaining, this being a matter either determined expressly by statute or lying with the sound discretion of the trial court.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.