Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ohio App. 3d 262 - Rainey v. Shaffer

8 Ohio App. 3d 262 - Rainey v. Shaffer’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably 80 Ohio App. 3d 345 - McCartney v. Oblates of St. Francis De Sales (1992), 48 Ohio App. 3d 296 - Palmer v. Westmeyer (1988)

21 state decisions

190198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ely v. Borck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]ominal damages may be awarded even if no actual loss is proven). But Anderson offers no precedent for the proposition that only nominal damages may be awarded, nor have we found any. {¶ 13} Baker testified that Anderson's statements caused a decline in the number of students taking her dance classes and damaged her reputation within the dance community. She estimated that she lost $5,000 to $10,000 in business income. In the context of rejecting Baker's claim of tortious interference with business relationships, however, the court found that Anderson's statements did not damage Baker in her ongoing or prospective business relations. The court also found that her claim of lost income due to a decline in class attendance was "speculative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.