8 Ohio App. 3d 286 - Haninger v. Haninger’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably 33 Ohio App. 3d 214 - Leighner v. Leighner (1986), 91 Ohio App. 3d 570 - McCoy v. McCoy (1993)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“both the amount of money one is capable of earning by his or her qualifications, as well as his or her ability to obtain such employment.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“in determining alimony * * * each party must be deemed employed to the extent of his or her earning capacity in the absence of evidence that such employment cannot be obtained.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he relative earning abilities of the parties * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schenck v. Schenck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.