8 Ohio App. 3d 289 - In Re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Defendant argues that [the complainant’s] office was not an unoccupied structure since the legislature has not defined the term and the regular meaning of the term applies only to the structure, not a portion thereof_ There is no distinction between trespassing from the outside of the structure and trespassing from within the structure from a permitted area into a locked prohibited area. A person who gains lawful entry into a part of a structure can trespass in another part of the structure he is authorized to be in, which constitutes a trespass in a structure. Whether the trespass commences from within or without the structure makes no difference....””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Milton v. State