Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ohio Misc. 2d 13 - State v. Albert

8 Ohio Misc. 2d 13 - State v. Albert’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ingraham v. Wright · State v. Adams · 5 Ohio App. 3d 207 - State v. Hoover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the decision to administer corporal punishment; (2) the method of corporal punishment undertaken; and (3) the results of the punishment as applied; and that each be considered in light of the required culpable mental state of recklessness on the part of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although probative, the end result cannot be conclusive of the standards of reasonableness and necessity required by R.C. 2919.22 * * *. To do so would be to place upon the administrator of the corporal punishment a burden of strict liability * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] person acts recklessly when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, he perversely disregards a known risk that his conduct is likely to cause a certain result or is likely to be of a certain nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.