Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 OHIOMISC2D 4 - In re Rios

In re Rios’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

106 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State ex rel. Jenkins v. Tyack (1985), In re Robinson (1996)

106 state decisions

58019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Schroepfer · In re Eader · In re Saylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Neither a single commissioner nor a panel of commissioners shall make an award to a claimant if any of the following applies: “(1) The victim was convicted of a felony within ten years prior to the criminally injurious conduct that gave rise to the claim or is convicted of a felony during the pendency of the claim. “(2) The claimant was convicted of a felony within ten years prior to the criminally injurious conduct that gave rise to the claim or is convicted of a felony during the pendency of the claim. “(3) It is proved by a preponderance of the evidence * * * that the victim or the claimant engaged, within ten years prior to the criminally injurious conduct that gave rise to the claim or during the pendency of the claim, in conduct that would constitute a felony under the laws of this state, another state, or the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.