Frazier v. Prince’s Empirical Analysis
1899
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1947
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on French v. Edwards · Glos v. Randolph · Ames v. Sankey · Ogden v. Bemis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Upon this point the decisions are numerous and uniform *****. “There must also be a law authorizing the issue of a warrant, and some person authorized to issue it, and it must. conform to the law authorizing it, and be issued by the proper person- designated by law, or it is no protection to a collector. No question is made anywhere of the correctness of this doctrine. Whatever may be the requisites of the warrant under the statute, care must be taken that they be observed/’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.