8 Or. App. 1 - State v. Jorgensen’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably 31 Cal. 3d 18 - People v. Shirley (1982), State v. Hurd (1981)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 20 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Since both of these witnesses gave their testimony concerning the issues of the case in open court and were subjected to prolonged and rigorous cross-examination by defendant’s counsel before the jury, we do not believe that the fact they had been subjected to certain psychiatric and medical examinations and procedures prior to testifying, which were fully exposed in the evidence, would be a basis for disallowing their testimony.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McQueen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.