State v. Tryba’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2025
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on C.T. Ex Rel. Taylor v. Johnson · Gohler v. Wood · State v. Johnson · State v. Gibbons · Horton v. Royal Order of the Sun
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Therefore, 'where the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, we do not look beyond the language's plain meaning to divine legislative intent”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(b) the defendant did not cause bodily injury to the child victim during or as a result of the offense and did not cause the child victim severe psychological harm; [[Image here]] (1) rehabilitation of the defendant through treatment is probable, based upon evidence provided by a treatment professional who has been approved by the Department of Corrections and the Department of Human Services ... and who has accepted the defendant for treatment; [[Image here]] (k) if the offense is committed by a parent, stepparent, adoptive parent, or legal guardian of the child victim, the defendant shall, ... establish it is in the child victim's best interest that the defendant not be imprisoned by presenting evidence provided by a treatment professional who: () is treating the child victim and understands he will be treating the family as a whole; or > (ii) has assessed the child victim for purposes of treatment as ordered by the court based on a showing of good cause [[Image here]]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“even the establishment of all the section 76-5-406.5(1) criteria by a prepon derance of the evidence does not compel a trial court to grant probation. Section 76-5-406.5[ (4) ] gives the court 'diseretion to deny the request based on its consideration of the cireumstances of the offense and impose the minimum mandatory sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rodriguez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.