8 So. 3d 3 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 839 So. 2d 1 - State v. Smith · 424 So. 2d 1009 - State v. Quebedeaux · 555 So. 2d 1331 - State v. Augustine · State v. Quebedeaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the defendant is convicted of two or more offenses based on the same act or transaction, or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, the terms of imprisonment shall be served concurrently unless the court expressly directs that some or all be served consecutively. Other sentences of imprisonment shall be served consecutively unless the court expressly directs that some or all of them be served concurrently. In the case of the concurrent sentence, the judge shall specify, and the court minutes shall reflect, the date from which the sentences are to run concurrently.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.