¶1Upon consideration of the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of March 5, 2009, the Court has determined that the December 30, 2008, order does not represent a conclusion to the judicial labor in this matter. The claims disposed of by the orders on appeal are inextricably intertwined with the counterclaims that remain pending, and the appeal is therefore premature. Cf. Mass. Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.
8 So. 3d 502
Arthur v. Smith
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 19, 2009
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-05-19
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2013
2 state decisions
Relies on Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-05-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →