Gonzalez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
105
cited by 105 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
105 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Johnson v. Zerbst · Blockburger v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Bjecause of the fundamental nature of double jeopardy protections, a double jeopardy claim may be raised for the first time on appeal ... when the undisputed facts show the double jeopardy violation is clearly apparent on the face of the record and when enforcement of usual rules of procedural default serves no legitimate state interests.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Saldana v. State · Collum v. State“Our' case-law on preservation of double jeopardy claims is not a model of clarity. The overriding principles expressed by this case-law are that, because of the fundamental nature of double jeopardy protections, a double jeopardy claim may be raised for the first time on appeal ór even for the first time on collateral ’ attack when the undisputed facts .show the double jeopardy violation is clearly apparent on the face of the record and when enforcement of usual rules of procedural default serves no legitimate state interests.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A person who is subject to prosecution under both this section and another section of this code may be prosecuted under either or both sections. Section 3.04 [mandatory severance] does not apply to criminal episodes prosecuted under both this section and another section of this code. If a criminal episode is prosecuted under both this section and another section of this code and sentences are assessed for convictions under both sections, the sentences shall run concurrently.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. McCrary v. State · Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.