State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably State v. Edwards (2003), Howard v. City of Kansas City (2011)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scharffe v. Perkins · Marquez v. Texas · Noram Energy Corp. v. United States · Harleysville Life Insurance v. Mardell · The Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad Company v. James Stimpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party to a cause, civil or criminal, against whom a witness has been called and given some evidence, shall be entitled to cross-examine said witness (except where a defendant in a criminal case is testifying in his own behalf) on the entire case....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gardner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.