Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 TC 726 - Adler v. Commissioner

Adler v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 1970
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1970

2 federal appellate ·

1001947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ford v. Comm'r · Houdry v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * Property within any country at war with the United States, or within an area under the control of any such country on the date war with such country was declared by the United States, shall be deemed to have been destroyed or seized on the date war with such country was declared by the United States.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * Under present conditions it is frequently impossible to determine when, if at all, the enemy country has formally seized the property located in an area under its control. Furthermore, enemy countries today exercise such control over the property of their enemies within their territory that the loss of such property is in fact sustained whether or not the country undertakes the formality of issuing a sequestration decree on making an actual seizure. It is a matter of conjecture as to what condition the property will be in at the termination of the war. Accordingly, such property is treated as lost upon the date war is declared * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The presumed loss and the presumed time of its occurence under subsection (2) constitutes in a sense an anticipatory or accelerated loss and does not operate to postpone losses previously sustained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.