Veit v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2000
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Poe v. Seaborn · Estate of Arms · 115 Cal. App. 525 - Bruggemeyer v. Zimmerman · Kimbell v. Commissioner · King v. Commissioner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * the doctrine of inchoate right, fixing the separate character of such moneys received by the spouse after marriage, upon a contract made before, does not exist in California. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Veit v. Commissioner“Since the right to the additional compensation for 1939 was earned while petitioner was domiciled in and a resident of New York, * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Veit v. Commissioner“a mere subterfuge and sham for the purpose of enabling petitioner to postpone his income tax,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Veit v. Commissioner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.