Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Terry 370 - State v. Boyd

State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1992

19 state decisions

7019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · 160 Pa. Super. 165 - Commonwealth v. Blose · Hunter v. State · State v. Cunningham · 82 Ga. App. 518 - Flournoy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I think that when the evidence of guilt is in close balance with evidence of innocence, the Court must give to the defendant the benefit of any reasonable doubt regarding the impact of prejudicial testimony upon the fairness of his trial. I cannot say with ‘fair assurance’ that members of the jury were not substantially swayed by the detective’s improper testimony when they weighed the defendant’s word against .that of his accuser. Therefore, it is impossible for me to conclude that the defendant’s right to a fair trial was not substantially impugned by the incompetent and prejudicial testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Q. Did Wells describe his assailant? A. He did. “Q. Did he identify him in any other way? A. He did. “Q. In what way did he identify him ? A. I returned to Wells’ home at about twelve noon with the picture of James C. Boyd, alias 'Curley’. This picture is under our file number 7868 and he identified this picture. “Mr. Miller: I object to that and move for mistrial on the ground that it is prejudicial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.